Jimmie Mae King v. The Housing Authority of the City of Huntsville, Alabama a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal of the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees and the subsequent order denying appellant’s motion to alter or amend the judgment. The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether appellee, the Housing Authority of the City of Huntsville (hereinafter, “Housing Authority”), is required by the regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter, “HUD”) at 24 C.F.R. §§ 866.50-51 and § 866.53(c) to afford appellant, Jimmie Mae King (hereinafter “King”) an administrative grievance…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- King v. HOUSING AUTHORITY ETC.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1980
3Cited by17 opinions
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- GIGGERS v. Memphis Housing AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1309 v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1309, Afl-Cio v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.