Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2007No. 05-6382PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
The petitioners, Maryann Schultz and James Schultz (collectively hereinafter “the Schultzes”), seek reversal of the district court opinion granting Smoky Mountain Materials, Inc.’s (“Smoky”) motion to dismiss, and Frank Carter’s (“Carter”) motion for summary judgment. Because the applicable statute of limitations bars the Schultzes’ personal injury claims, and T.C.A. § 20-1-119 is not applicable to the facts of this case, we affirm the district court opinion.
BACKGROUND
The Schultzes are residents of Massachusetts who, on August 7, 2002, while shopping for a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Potts v. Celotex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Foster v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
- Doyle v. FrostTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Townes v. Sunbeam Oster Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Curtis v. G.E. Capital Modular SpaceTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Calvin Gray Mills, Jr. v. Fulmarque, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Michael S. Becker v. Ford Motor CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Wagner v. International Automotive Components Group North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Willis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Woodward v. City of GallatinDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.