Legal Opinion
Strick Corp. v. Cravens Homalloy (Sheffield) Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 29, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-2160PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Defendant, Cravens, Homalloy (Sheffield) Ltd., (hereinafter Cravens) is a foreign corporation, with its principal place of business in Great Britain. Plaintiff, Strick Corporation (hereinafter Strick), is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania. On June 9, 1966, these two parties entered into a five-year licensing agreement which provided Cravens with a license to produce Strick trailers, containers, and related equipment in England. For this five-year period, Strick was also required to provide Cravens…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wenzel v. Morris Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Tejas Development Co. v. McGough Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Campbell v. Triangle CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Optico Corporation v. Standard Tool CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Tracer Research Corp. v. National Environmental Services Company, Doing Business as Nesco Lab One Analytical, Inc. Eddy Paterson Albert McCutchanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Honda Associates, Inc. v. Nozawa Trading, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Galaxy International, Inc. v. White Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Carter v. MasseyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.