Legal Opinion

Eisman v. Mathews

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 25, 1977No. Civ. A. M-75-1169PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.

In this action plaintiff, William Perry Eisman, as the personal representative of the Estate of Bertha Eisman, seeks judicial review of the Secretary’s final decision which denied “Medicare” payments under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act for certain hospital expenses of the deceased, Bertha Eisman, and which ordered repayment to the Secretary of earlier disbursements found to have been mistakenly paid by the Secretary on behalf of Mrs. Eisman. The jurisdiction of this court to review the Secretary’s determination arises under 42 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Cecil Rowe, on Behalf of Dewanna S. Rowe, Infant v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. Brown v. RichardsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Fineberg v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Friedberg v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. 6 soc.sec.rep.ser. 142, Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,082 Rose Mayburg v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. Friedberg v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Levine v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1981
  5. Steinberg v. SchweikerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API