Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Cohen

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 2, 1968No. 276PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

The question is whether the ceiling on an attorney’s fee under §206 (b)(1) of the Social Security Act, as amended,1 79 Stat. 403, 42 U. S. C. §406 (b)(1) (1964 *531ed., Supp. II), is based on the benefits received by the claimant alone or may be based also on the benefits that other dependent members of his family receive by virtue of the claimant’s disability.

Respondent ruled that petitioner2 was not totally and permanently disabled within the meaning of the Act. The District Court reversed and awarded the claimant’s attorney a fee equal to 25% of the benefits accruing to the claimant alone. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lovel Redden v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. James B. Lambert v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. Marans v. NewlandMontana Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Sinkler v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Koester v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
  5. Frank G. Fenix and Jessie P. Fenix v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API