Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Arlando's Style Shop.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1981No. 79-748PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment adverse to the plaintiff, Bishop M.H. Hughes, by the Circuit Court of Mobile County. In his appeal, plaintiff claims that the trial judge erred in not allowing him to introduce a shirt belonging to the plaintiff, and some clippings from the plaintiff's head. Plaintiff claims that the bloody shirt and hair sought to be introduced both went to the extent of the damage he suffered as a result of defendant's negligence. The trial court disallowed the introduction of this evidence because plaintiff's attorney could not state to the court that this physical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Currie v. Great Central Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. David L. Trask, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Magic Spuds, Inc. v. Carl SusskindCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Westric Battery Company, a Colorado Corporation v. Standard Electric Co., Inc., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Electrolux Motor AB v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Clements v. Dr. John Alvan Stewart, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Harris v. Health Care Authority of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Kirkland & Co. of Anniston v. a & M FOODSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API