Legal Opinion
Gilbert v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided May 19, 1972No. Civ. No. 340-71PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TOLEDO, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved this Court, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,1 Title 28, United States Code to strike affirmative defenses numbers 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 set forth in the answer to the complaint of codefendant Eli Lilly & Co., Inc. and affirmative defenses numbers 3, 4 and 6 set forth in the answer to the complaint of codefendant Lord Electric Company of Puerto Rico, Inc.2 This Court, through an Order entered on November 4, 1971, 337 F.Supp. 50, disposed of the affirmative defense number 4 raised by eodefendant Lord…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen Renee Augustus, a Minor, by Charles A. Augustus, Her Father, and Next Friend v. The Board of Public Instruction of Escambia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Fleischer v. A.A.P., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Danny P. Emmons v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Clark County School District v. Richardson Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Carone v. WhalenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Talbot v. Robert Matthews Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.