Faris v. Finnup
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal. from Finney district court.
1ConcurrenceWest, J.
(concurring specially) : I concur in the result of the foregoing decision but can not assent to the doctrine that from nothing something can be evolved. It is held in this state that the grantee in a quitclaim deed from his immediate grantor is put upon inquiry by the very fact that it is a quitclaim, and this rule is founded on common sense, and practical experience in this state, in the western portion of which one’s land is often spoken of as so many “quarters” instead of so many acres, and where real ’ estate is handled very *127much as chattels are handled. Such grantor can convey no better…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moelle v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Milam County v. J. M. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Mason v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Rich v. DownsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Carter v. WiseTexas Supreme Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.