United Laundries Co. v. Bradford
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Duffy, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
The question of main importance in this ease is whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support the inference that the personal injuries sued for were permanent in their effects. The plaintiff was struck by a bale of hay, weighing’ about 240 pounds, which was thrown down from the third floor of a stable and storage building of the defendants, abutting upon the sidewalk along which the plaintiff was passing. It is not disputed that there was legally sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of the defendants-’ employees in the handling of the hay which caused the plaintiff’s injury.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wilhelm v. State of Maryland Traffic Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Dixon v. Process Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Jewel Tea Co. v. BlambleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Mangione v. SneadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Cluster v. UptonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.