San Diego Department of Social Services v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
The trial court, on its own motion, granted the reestablishment of Charles Moore, Jr.’s conservatorship. On appeal, Moore contends a conservatorship cannot constitutionally be reestablished without a formal hearing and that Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 5362 cannot be authority for any lesser process. We find Moore’s due process challenges lack merit and affirm the ex parte reestablishment order. However, we recognize Moore may be entitled to relief on writ of habeas corpus and accordingly decide this case without prejudice to Moore’s claim to extraordinary…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Christopher Evans Hubbart v. Robert Knapp Atascadero State HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. John L.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.