Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Crisman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1921No. Civil No. 1912PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. O. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This action was brought by Crisman as a taxpayer to restrain the Industrial Commission, *580the State Auditor, and State Treasurer from putting into operation the Workmen’s Compensation Law enacted by the fifth state legislature (chapter 103, Laws 1921), upon the claim or ground that it violates the state Constitution in requiring the employee to elect before he is injured whether he will accept compensation under said act or not. A temporary injunction was issued and, upon final hearing, the court permanently enjoined defendants from doing or taking any steps toward putting said act into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. ConwellArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. UjackArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Behringer v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API