Legal Opinion

Martin v. First Nat. Bank of Rush City

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 10, 1931No. 2045PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The above-entitled matter came on -for trial before the undersigned, one of the judges of the above-named court, without a jury, at Duluth, Minn., on the 7th day of May, 1931; R. C. Andrews of Lindstrom, Minn., appearing in behalf of the plaintiff, and S. B. Wennerberg, Center City, Minn., and George H. Sullivan, Stillwater, Minn., appearing in behalf of the defendant. The court having heard the evidence adduced at said trial, and upon all the files and records herein and the arguments and briefs submitted to said court, makes the following findings of fact and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. White v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Allen v. Puritan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Holden v. . New York and Erie BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Adoue & LobitTexas Supreme Court · 1911

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Munroe v. HarrimanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Martineau v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  4. Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  5. Estate of Scofield v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API