Legal Opinion

Risse v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 2012No. 1111 C.D. 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.1

William R. Risse (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the decision of the Referee which denied his petition for appeal because he was not engaged in a qualifying sideline activity and was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(h) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).2 Because the Board erred in determining that Claimant’s sideline activity had substantially changed, we reverse the decision of the Board.

Claimant was last employed on a full-time basis by Johnson Controls as an account…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Myers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Higgins v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Quinn v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. O'Hara v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Kress v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lello v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Crocker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Risse v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Risse v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. T.L. Macauley v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API