Legal Opinion

In re Heap

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 4, 1935No. 3420PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner, *951rejecting all of the claims of appellant’s application for want of invention over the prior art. The three claims of the application read as follows:

1. A lead-acid storage battery negative pole plate containing finely ground peat.

2. A lead-acid storage battery negative pole plate containing approximately one half of 1% of finely ground peat.

3. A paste for the manufacture of lead-acid storage battery negative pole plates containing the resultant products of an…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1942
  2. Application of Charles E. InmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. In re InmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  4. In re AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API