Legal Opinion
Folk v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 22, 1966No. Nos. 66-176, 66-177PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
These appeals, which were briefed and argued together, are by two appellants, Thomas D. Folk and Alfred Liquari. After a joint non-jury trial, they were convicted in the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida as follows: Appellant Folk was found guilty of uttering a forged instrument. .(Fla.Stat.196S, § 831.02, F.S.A.) 1 appellant Liquari was convicted of forgery (Fla.Stat., § 831.01, F.S. A.) 2 and uttering.a forged instrument.
*46The two points presented challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. The first point states that the signing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hugo Bob Hubsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Kenneth John Berry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Harold Franklin Edge, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- American Express Co. v. City Nat. Bank of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. EscobedoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Jalbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979