Freeborn v. Holt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 5. Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Albert C. Hunt, Judge). Action by L. B. Holt against F. W. Freeborn for recovery of damages sustained to his automobile in a collision. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THOMPSON, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., by L. B. Holt, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against F. W. Freeborn, plaintiff in error, defendant bqlow, to recover damages for the destruction of an automobile as a result of a collision between an automobile owned by plaintiff in error and the one owned by defendant in error.
The parties to this action will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the lower court.
Plaintiff alleges in his petition that he was the owner of a Dodge automobile of the value of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Larkey v. ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Hollingshead v. HollingsheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meyn v. Dulaney-Miller Auto Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Prest-O-Lite Co., Inc. v. HowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Parman ex rel. Parman v. LemmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- McIntire v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.