Moore v. Rugg.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
• Action brought in the district court for Hennepin county, to recover $5,000 damages on the cause of action stated in the opinion. Appeal by defendant from an order by Rea, J., overruling his demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The complaint in this action is not a model, as is admitted by the attorney who drew it, but it appears therefrom that defendant, a photographer, had been employed to make, and had made and sold to plaintiff, a number of photographic portraits of herself; and that subsequently, without the order or consent.of plaintiff, he made and delivered to a detective another of these photographs, who used it in a manner particularly stated in the pleading, and claimed to have been highly improper. In justice to defendant, it is right that we should here remark that it is nowhere averred in the complaint…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Melvin v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Snakenberg v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Eick v. Perk Dog Food Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Kelley v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Anderson v. Fisher Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.