Legal Opinion

Frankowski v. Palermo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 16, 1975No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and summary judgment granted plaintiff in accordance with the following memorandum: A cash purchase of par value stock cannot he made under section 504 of the Business Corporation Law for less than par value (Stone v. Young, 210 App. Div. 303; 2 White, New York Corporations [13th ed.], par. 504.02). In determining whether full par value has been paid for the issuance of par value stock, the cancellation of a corporation debt is considered equivalent to a cash payment in the amount of the debt (Feeder v. Mudgett, 95 N". Y. 295, 315; 2 White, New York…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. B. & C. Electrical Construction Co. v. OwenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Stone v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,409 S. & S. Realty Corp. v. Kleer-Vu Industries, Inc. And Benjamin OsherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Stewart Becker, Ltd. v. HorowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Sloan v. Inolife Techs., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API