Legal Opinion

Guardian Securities Corp. v. Mahoney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1932No. 9629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPheasants, J.

This suit was instituted by appellant as attorney in fact for Bankers Dloyds, insurers, to set aside an award by the State Industrial Accident Board in favor of appellees against the Bankers Dloyds. In answer to the suit the appellees Michael Mahoney and his attorney Harry Dow by eross-aetion sought to recover against Bankers' Dloyds upon a workman’s compensation policy issued by said insurer to the Hubbard Construction Company, the employer of appellee Mahoney, for an injury sustained by Mahoney in. the course of his employment. The amount claimed under the policy is $20 per week for 401…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Blohm v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Dillard v. First Nat. Bank of CanyonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aschenbeck v. AschenbeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Pillot v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. RowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Morrison v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Southern Underwriters v. WeddleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API