Legal Opinion
Francesconi v. Kardon Chevrolet, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 27, 1988No. Civ. 87-4203 (CSF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
This action was instituted by plaintiff, Albert R. Francesconi, who alleges that he was injured as a result of certain fraudulent conduct by the defendant during the negotiation of a lease for a 1985 Isuzu Impulse automobile (the “Isuzu”). The complaint alleges two separate grounds for relief. The first count alleges that the defendant, Kardon Chevrolet, Inc., failed to comply with the odometer tampering and disclosure requirements of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1972 (the “Odometer Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1981 et seq. The second…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Tully v. Mott Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Samuel Weaver and Alice Weaver v. Marine BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rolo v. City Investing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Albert R. Francesconi v. Kardon Chevrolet, Inc., D/B/A Kardon Auto MallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Henricks v. Fletcher Chrysler Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Geneva Enterprises, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- HARRIS v. BASCODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025