Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Luckett v. City of Elizabethtown

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 6, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORNE, Judge.

The sole question presented upon this appeal is whether the City of Elizabethtown is liable for use tax under KRS 139.310 for certain items of equipment purchased outside of the state. The Board of Tax Appeals held that the city was not liable. This ruling was affirmed by the Franklin Circuit Court. The pertinent part of KRS 139.310 reads as follows:

“An excise tax is hereby imposed on the storage, use or other consumption in this state or tangible personal property purchased on or after July 1, 1960, for storage, use or other consumption in this state at the rate of three…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. George v. ScentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walgreen Co. v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Howard Electrical & Mechanical, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. City of Lexington v. Motel Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  4. City of Springfield v. FredricksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. Interstate Gas Supply, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API