Legal Opinion

Lang v. Fornea

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1961No. 5251PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Judge.

This controversy arose when plaintiffs, Geralding Lang Martin, Robert Lang, Jimmie R. Lang, and Norman Lang, Jr., as forced heirs, of Ethelbert Fornea Lang, filed suit against their uncles, namely, Robert H. Fornea, Curtis J. Fornea, Weldon W. Fornea, Alcus Fornea, Ruffin For-nea, Daniel E. Fornea, Tom Paul Fornea and J. Edward Fornea, and their grandmother, Docia Fornea, for partition of their grandfather’s, and a deceased uncle, James Fornea’s estate. The case was submitted by stipulation and upon the introduction of certain deeds in the record without any testimony.

The suit was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. ReeseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Erskine v. GardinerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Latham v. GlasscockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Crayton v. WatersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. Kendrick's Heirs v. KendrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pocahontas Land Corp. v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Eves v. Morgan City FundLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Tucker v. KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API