Legal Opinion

People v. Bradford

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoses M. Weinstein, J.

This is a motion to renew an application to remit forfeiture and vacate judgment which was denied by decision and order dated January 31, 1973. Although, the instant motion, made pursuant to CPLR 2221, has been erroneously designated a motion to reargue, it is in substance a motion to renew upon additional facts and will be treated as such.

One thousand dollars bail was forfeited by the surety on February 3, 1972 and the original application which was returnable January 31,1973 was timely (CPL 540.30). It was heard on that date and denied since the defendant had not been produced. Thereafter,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. GrundyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. People v. Brenner, New York County Courts1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Midland InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. Stuyvesant InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API