Legal Opinion

Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. Vilkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1984No. WD 34822PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Mercantile Bank and Trust Company (hereinafter payee) originally filed suit against Peter I. Vilkins (hereinafter maker) for the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest, along with costs of collection including reasonable attorney’s fees, due and owing under a $33,000.00 promissory note, payable in installments, signed by the maker and naming the bank as payee. The case was ultimately tried to a jury on the limited issue of “costs of collection including reasonable attorney’s fees,” infra, resulting in a verdict in favor of the maker and against the payee, and the latter has appealed.

Pay…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Household Finance Company, Inc. v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Cunningham Ex Rel. Cunningham v. HayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Aubuchon v. LaPlantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Higgins v. GosneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of Kirksville v. SmallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Wilson v. LockwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Bank of Brookfield-Purdin, N.A. v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Estell v. Estate of IdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. VilkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API