Legal Opinion

Wall v. Woods

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens-, J.

Appellant filed a bond in the form of a supersedeas and appeal bond but insufficient by $46.25 to be double the amount of the judgment plus $300. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the bond is Void. Appellant argues that since no objection to the amount was made within twenty days of the time the bond was given such objection was waived.

Meservy v. Idaho Irr. Co., 35 Ida. 257, 205 Pac. 559, held that a supersedeas and appeal bond might be contained in one instrument and that this did not conflict with Weiser River Fruit Assn. v. Feltham, 31 Ida. 633, 175 Pac. 583, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weiser River Fruit Ass'n v. FelthamIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Meservy v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Kelley v. SakaiWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Libby v. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Wilson v. PeckIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Sicklin v. Mayfield Land & Livestock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Rowe v. HewlettIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API