Legal Opinion

Van Sicklin v. Mayfield Land & Livestock Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.

— In an action in which E. A. Van Sicklin and W. E. Adams were plaintiffs and Mayfield Land & Livestock Company, the Boise Livestock Loan Company of Chicago, W. C. White, County Assessor, Earl R. Gilbreath, Treasurer and Tax Collector, Robert B. Stocker, J. W. Brown, D. R. Kendall, the County of Lemhi and Wallace W. Slavin were defendants, the court made and entered a decree in which Van Sicklin and Adams were granted certain relief against Lemhi county and its taxing officers and in which Lemhi county was awarded certain relief against the Boise Livestock Loan Company of Chicago. Boise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Gile v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Meservy v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Downing v. RademacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Wall v. WoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lemhi County Ex Rel. Gilbreath v. Boise Livestock Loan Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. SteelyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Jensen v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. Bothwell v. KeeferIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Rowe v. HewlettIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API