Legal Opinion

Moore v. . Tidwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 25, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Prior to the call of this case for argument, which comes from the Fourteenth District, the appealing defendants duly notified plaintiff of their intention to renew the motion, originally made in the Superior Court, for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. With respect to this motion, the following order was entered 28 April, 1927, and notice thereof duly given to counsel on both sides:

“Motion continued until 24 May, 1927, with leave to both parties to file additional affidavits, if so advised. Appellants shall file their affidavits by 18 May, 1927, and appellees…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Teeter v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Byrd v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API