Legal Opinion
Odesser v. Continental Bank
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 1987No. 86-7265PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This case is before me on defendants’ motions to dismiss. The complaint of plaintiffs Gary and Anita Odesser 1 alleges that defendants Continental Bank (“Continental”) and Gary Jaffe, Esq. (“Jaffe”), acting through a pattern of racketeering, and by conspiring with, aiding and abetting Howard Vogel (“Vogel”), participated in wrongfully obtaining control over Philadelphia Video Exchange (“PVE,” “the company”) and ousting its founder and former president, Gary Odesser (“Odesser”) from the company. The complaint also alleges a variety of pendent state…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Landy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- K. Kay Shearin v. The E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., E.F. Hutton & Company Inc. And E.F. Hutton Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Williams v. CallaghanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Loftus v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.