Legal Opinion

Foster v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 29, 1972No. Docket Nos. 4009-70 and 4010-70UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Tully V. Foster v. Commissioner. Tully V. Foster and Mary A. Foster v. Commissioner.

Foster v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 4009-70 and 4010-70.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1972-188; 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 67; 31 T.C.M. (CCH) 913; T.C.M. (RIA) 72188;

August 29, 1972

John Kennedy Lynch, Conway & Lynch, 907 The East Ohio Bldg., Cleveland, Ohio, John J. Kane, Jr., and John E. Phillips, for the petitioners. Larry L. Nameroff, for the respondent.

TANNENWALD

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

TANNENWALD, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in income tax and additions to the tax as follows:

Docke…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. William J. Drieborg and Laura D. Drieborg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, William J. Drieborg v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. Shaw v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  5. George Schwarzkopf v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tully v. Foster v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API