Dorsey v. Temple
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WALTHALL, Justice.
This suit was brought in trespass to try title. For convenience, and to follow the scheme of appellants’ brief, the parties will be designated as in the trial court. By the term “plaintiff” we shall refer to the appellant Ollie Mae Dorsey, she being the real party at interest, her husband, Lapoleon Dorsey, having been joined pro forma.
Plaintiff claims an undivided ¾2 interest in the 198.8-acre tract described in her petition. Her title, legal and equitable, to such interest, originated by inheritance, ¾2 from her mother, Amanda Miller, and ¼2 from her father, C. A. Miller.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Eylar v. EylarTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Hanrick v. GurleyTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Baldwin v. RootTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Ramirez v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1900
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sandoval v. RattikinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Harvey v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- First Savings & Loan Ass'n of El Paso v. AvilaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- STONE, CHAIRMAN v. SampleMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Rawdon v. GarvieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.