Legal Opinion

(PC) Miller v. Meda

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 24, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00264Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NORRIS DAJON MILLER, Case No. 1:22-cv-264-HBK 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE 13 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 14 JANET MEDA; JOVITA VILLANUEVA; V. PATEL; C. WILLIAMS, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Defendants. ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 16 (Doc. No. 2) 17 18 19 Plaintiff Norris Dajon Miller, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil 20 rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1).…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Coleman v. TollefsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel ParamoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API