Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. King v. Payton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1935No. 23137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The action is in the nature of a quo warranto proceeding and seeks to oust the defendant from public office. The plaintiff alleges that one Dee T. Watters was the Democratic nominee, and the defendant the Republican nominee for the office of sheriff of Ottawa county at the election of November 4, 1930; that Watters was legally elected by a majority of 159 votes and that Payton, the defendant, is usurping the office by reason of certain ballot tampering.

Thereafter the defendant filed his motion to dismiss the action, alleging, among other things, as follows:

“That the issues of fact and matters…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maharry v. EatmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Jarman v. MasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Henley v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Smock v. Farmers' Union State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Linegar v. RittenhouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1879

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. DarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Yocham v. County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Murphy v. DarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API