Legal Opinion
Xu Yong Lu v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 24, 2001No. 00-3393UnknownCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Xu Yong Lu seeks to reopen immigration proceedings on account of alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. Lu filed a motion to reopen before an Immigration Judge, which was denied. The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed, in part because Lu failed to comply with the procedural requirements laid out in Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637, 1988 WL 235454 (BIA 1988). We conclude that the Lozada requirements are a reasonable exercise of the Board’s discretion; furthermore, the Board did not err in holding that Lu failed to satisfy these…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Shobna Chandar Lata v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Xu Yong Lu v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Rosendo Ponce Flores v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Ivis Alexander-Mendoza v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Callahan v. HSBC Holdings plcDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Chmakov v. BlackmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.