George Edward Henkel v. The Honorable Winston L. Bradshaw, Circuit Court Judge of the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
This action for injunctive and declaratory relief was initiated by Henkel pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 The District Court denied in-junctive relief but granted a declaratory judgment in Henkel’s favor. We reverse.
In July, 1968 Henkel had been ordered by a state trial court to pay $150 per month as child support for his two minor children. On September 16, 1969, after a request by Oregon’s district attorney, 2 the state court issued an order directing Henkel to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Boyle v. LandrySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Jerry Parker, Jr. v. Kenneth TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Martori Bros. Distributors v. James-MassengaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Donald A. Ridgway v. T.L. Baker, Potter County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- McNabb v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.