Mintz v. American Tax Relief, LLC
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*518OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul G. Feinman, J.
Defendant moves, preanswer, to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Background
Plaintiffs, the Commissioner of the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) and the City of New York, allege that defendant American Tax Relief, LLC violated the Consumer Protection Law which prohibits “deceptive trade practices” in the offering of its services to New York City consumers (notice of motion to dismiss verified complaint 1Í1Í 2, 7). Plaintiffs allege that defendant mailed six…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.New York Supreme Court, New York County · 2025
- City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.New York Supreme Court, New York County · 2025