Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. Snody

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1905No. 1401PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Baylor County. Snody sued Waggoner and others for damages and recovered judgment. It was affirmed on appeal by defendants, who thereupon obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

In the absence of conclusions of fact by the Court of Civil' Appeals, we make the following statement from the undisputed evidence in the record, which we think is sufficient for the examination of the questions presented.

One Wyatt was owner of two sections of land, which were situated in a pasture that belonged to P. S. Witherspoon, who rented the said land from Wyatt upon the agreement that Witherspoon was to pay annually the interest upon a portion of the purchase money due to the State of Texas and the taxes for each )ear. Witherspoon sold his pasture to Waggoner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. May v. SladeTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Wheelwright v. DepeysterNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  3. American District Telegraph Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  4. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KnappTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Gillette v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Big MacK Trucking Company, Inc. v. DickersonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. GoldstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Wheatland Irrigation District v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gulf, T. & W. Ry. Co. v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API