Legal Opinion
United States v. Frye
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 4, 2004No. 02-60524PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
The Government’s interlocutory appeal presents two points: our jurisdiction; and the district court’s ruling that the Government may not seek the death penalty against James Frye, pursuant to finding that, by misrepresenting it would not seek the penalty, the Government violated Frye’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.
We have jurisdiction. And, because there has not been a speedy trial violation, we need not address the proper remedy. VACATED and REMANDED. *
I
Indicted in February 2001, Frye and Cooper were charged, inter alia, with the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Richard E. WallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Molina-SolorioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Goodrum v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.