Fredrick v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUMMERS, Judge.
Appellant, Billy H. Fredrick, presents a pro se appeal as of right from an order entered by the trial court denying his petition for writ of habeas coitus. The court treated appellant’s writ as a petition for post-conviction relief and dismissed it for being time barred pursuant to T.CA. § 40-30-102. Appellant now appeals, contending that (1) T.C.A. § 40-30-102 is unconstitutional, and (2) that the trial court erred in dismissing his petition without an evidentiary hearing.
On October 27,1992, appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus attacking a guilty plea…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Potts v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Holbrook v. BomarTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Swanson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Donald R. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
- Dwight Seaton v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Eric D. Wallace v. Stephen Dotson, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- Frank Barnard v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- James Bell, Jr. v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.