Legal Opinion

Fredrick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 10, 1993PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUMMERS, Judge.

Appellant, Billy H. Fredrick, presents a pro se appeal as of right from an order entered by the trial court denying his petition for writ of habeas coitus. The court treated appellant’s writ as a petition for post-conviction relief and dismissed it for being time barred pursuant to T.CA. § 40-30-102. Appellant now appeals, contending that (1) T.C.A. § 40-30-102 is unconstitutional, and (2) that the trial court erred in dismissing his petition without an evidentiary hearing.

On October 27,1992, appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus attacking a guilty plea…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Potts v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Holbrook v. BomarTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Swanson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Donald R. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  2. Dwight Seaton v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Eric D. Wallace v. Stephen Dotson, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  4. Frank Barnard v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. James Bell, Jr. v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API