Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Masterson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932No. 23597Published

1ConcurrenceMarshall, C. J.

I concur in the judgment of reversal in this case, upon the sole ground that the issue of the last clear chance doctrine was not made by the pleadings, and it was therefore reversible error to receive evidence upon that issue, and was also error to instruct the jury upon that issue. I cannot concur in any of the syllabi, and must dissent from the declarations of law in each of the five syllabi. I shall briefly state the reasons for my dissent.

The first, second, third and fourth syllabi relate to the rule of the last clear chance doctrine, but none of them places the reversal upon the grounds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. EllzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Knisely v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Campion v. EakleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. Gilbert v. Erie R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  5. Robinson v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API