Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Reimel
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
BURKE, J., Dissenting.
In my view the opinion prepared for the Court of Appeal by Presiding Justice Devine and concurred in by Justice Rattigan and Justice Christian (reported in (Cal.App.) 62 Cal.Rptr. 914) properly construes and applies the constitutional and statutory provisions relied upon by appellants, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and its director, in their efforts to sustain the rule forbidding quantity discounts on wholesale sales of beer. Furthermore, I think it adequately discusses and correctly resolves adversely to the department the questions presented on this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Allied Properties v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Louis Stores, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Simmons v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Blatz Brewing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.