Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1916No. L. A. No. 3518. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by C.A. Scott and his wife under the provisions of the Torrens Land Act. They sought a decree establishing title in themselves to school section 36, township 13 south, range 13 east, S. B. M., in Imperial County, which section was located as tract 57 of the resurvey of the township under the act of Congress of July 1, 1902. Notice was duly served upon all the persons named as occupants of tract 57 and occupants of the lands adjoining this tract. The petition states that tract 57 of the resurvey is section 36 of the original survey; that John J. Miller occupied the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Horne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Whitaker v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Russell v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Stoneroad v. StoneroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelsey v. Lake Childs Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. United States v. AikinsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
  3. In Re ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Lake Childs Co. v. KelseySupreme Court of Florida · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API