Legal Opinion

United States v. Aikins

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 20, 1940No. Civil Action No. 617-NDPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

An original government survey by one Reed in 1869 of Township 29 South, Range 20 East, M. D. B. & M., showed Section 36 therein to contain 640 acres of land. In 1892 a re-survey of the entire township was ordered by the Government and made by one Carpenter, which re-survey was approved in 1894. In the meanwhile, the State of -California had sold and issued patents, as school land, to all of the land which had been included in Section 36 of the Reed survey. By the 'Carpenter resurvey the southerly and easterly boundaries of the township were shifted south and east, -and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Leavenworth, Lawrence, & Galveston Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Wyoming and the Richfield Oil Corporation, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. State of WyomingDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1961
  3. United States v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. United States v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API