Clay v. Weidner

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL CLAY, ) ) CASE NO. 1:19CV1916 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON ) MCKALEE WEIDNER, et al., ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND Defendants. ) ORDER [Resolving ECF Nos. 7, 15] Pending are Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) and motion to strike Plaintiffs sur-reply (ECF No. 15). The motion to dismiss has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 7, 11, 13, and 14. For the reasons explained below, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The motion to strike is granted. I. Introduction…