Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 4, 1992No. Nos. 91-1013 to 91-1018 and 91-1020 to 91-1023PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & G”) appeals from the district court’s order of October 30, 1990, 132 F.R.D. 660, to realign the parties in this action and to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant Thomas Solvent Company (“Thomas Solvent”) operated chemical distribution facilities in Battle Creek, Michigan, from 1963 until 1986. From 1970 to 1981, the company was licensed by the State of Michigan as a liquid waste hauler and handled liquid industrial wastes.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Edward L. Lowe v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, a Division of Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Employers Insurance Of Wausau v. Crown Cork & Seal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Amsouth Bank (03-5517) First Tennessee Bank (03-5521) v. George DaleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States Fidelity And Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Hrivnak v. NCO Portfolio Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Misiak v. FreehCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.