Legal Opinion

Comerica Bank v. Mann

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided September 17, 2013No. Civil No. 1:11-CV-467-ATPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

AMY TOTENBER, United States District Judge.

This is a deficiency action by Plaintiff, Comerica Bank (“Comerica”) against Defendant Charles H. Mann, III (“Mann”) for damages based upon Plaintiffs enforcement of a written security guaranty and for related contractual attorney’s fees and other expenses. The Court previously granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in this case, granting summary judgment as to Defendant’s liability under the guaranty and denying summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s claim for damages. The parties’ mortgage contract required a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. ACLU of Georgia v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Frank Briscoe Company, Inc. v. Georgia Sprinkler Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maye v. Online Land Sales LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API