Legal Opinion

Syracuse Savings Bank v. Onondaga Silk Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwift, J.

The plaintiff is the holder of two mortgages upon premises owned by the defendant. These mortgages, which were assumed by the defendant, became due, one in the year 1900, and the other in 1910. Interest and taxes on the property have been paid to date and under the moratorium statutes the mortgages cannot at present be foreclosed. In 1920 the premises consisted of a two-family residence, and were used as such. In 1923 the defendant, while using the lower floor as an office, erected upon that floor a steel and concrete vault for the storage of silk, and in 1927 a second vault was built in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. HearttNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Campbell v. MacombNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  3. Syracuse Savings Bank v. Onondaga Silk Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellington Credit Fund, Ltd. v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. Garliner v. GlickenNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Albany Savings Bank, FSB v. NovakNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Heller v. GerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API