Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kennedy

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1990No. 89-285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict, awarding money damages for breach of a warranty to construct a swimming pool in a competent and workmanlike manner, and from a judgment of the district court, awarding attorney’s fees.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The primary issue is whether a contractor, who installed an in-ground swimming pool and damaged its liner in the process, is liable to the owner for attorney’s fees under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301 through 2312 (1988) (Warranty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hashimoto v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Condict v. Whitehead, Zunker, Gage, Davidson & Shotwell, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. City of Cheyenne v. SimpsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. TG v. Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Soles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wardell v. McMillanWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Smith v. KennedyWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wardell v. McMillanWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API