Legal Opinion

Helton v. Luse & Fosdick Drilling Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1941No. 2086PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

R. S. Helton instituted this suit against Luse & Fosdick Drilling Company to recover “permanent damages” to a 163-acre tract of land. Plaintiff .lived on said tract and had long been engaged there in farming and stock raising. It was alleged that plaintiff’s said farm was traversed by a stream known as Trent Branch; that said stream entered plaintiff’s farm on its northwest corner and flowed across said farm in a southeasterly direction; that -said stream was a “stream” or “water course” in the sense that said terms are used in Art. 698a of the Vernon’s Ann. Penal Code of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Monkey Grip Rubber Co. v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Traders & General Insurance v. LincecumTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Texas Utilities Co. v. DearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Handy v. Olney Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Kaker v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Triangle Cab Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Roy L. Jones Truck Line v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Davis v. DamgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Craghead v. United Transports, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Gillum v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API