Legal Opinion

Epping v. Washington Invest. Assoc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Multnomah: Melvin C. George, Judge. Suit by J. Adrian Epping, individually and as executor of the estate of Louise I. E.. Epping, deceased, against the Washington National Building, Loan & Investment Association. From a decree in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The case was submitted on briefs under the proviso of Rule 16 of the supreme court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is a suit by J. Adrian Epping, in his own right and as executor of the estate of Louise I. E. Epping, deceased, *117to compel the cancellation of a note and mortgage to the defendant building and loan association. The mortgage was given by Epping on August 11, 1894, to secure the payment of a promissory note executed by him to the defendant for $1,500, due on or before eighty-four months after date, bearing interest at 6 per cent per annum, and 6 per cent per annum as premium, and also to secure the payment of $9.75 per month on fifteen shares of stock in the defendant company, which he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington Investment Ass'n v. StanleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Irwin v. Washington Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hubert v. Washington Investment Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Egan v. North American Loan Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Darr v. Guaranty Loan Assoc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API