Legal Opinion

Sauer v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, George W. Sauer, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 14th day off September, 1903, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits..

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The plaintiff owns the premises situate at the southwesterly corner of Eighth avenue .and One Hundred, and Fifty-fifth street, having a *37frontage of one hundred and seventy-five feet on One Hundred and Fifty-fifth street and forty-nine feet and eleven inches on Eighth avenue. He brings this suit in equity to enjoin the defendant from using the viaduct constructed above and along One Hundred and Fifty-fifth street and to compel the removal of the same and to recover consequential damages. The city owns the fee to One Hundred and Fifty-fifth street and to Eighth avenue and holds the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Liddick v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Matter of Crane v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. People ex rel. Architects' Offices, Inc. v. OrmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. People ex rel. City of New York v. HennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. People ex rel. Crane v. OrmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API